Abstract
AIM: The present study evaluates the marginal adaptation, shade matching, and patient satisfaction of polychromatic feldspathic porcelain laminate veneers compared to hybrid ceramic multicolor laminate veneers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 26 patients required one side veneer to restore discolored, fractured, or maligned anterior teeth. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of restoration used. The Comparator group included patients receiving multicolor feldspathic (TriLuxe forte) laminate veneers Intervention group included patients receiving Multicolor hybrid ceramic laminate veneers (multicolored Vita Enamic). After final cementation, Marginal Adaptation, Shade matching, and Patient satisfaction were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria, after 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up intervals.
RESULTS: Marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction showed a statistically insignificant difference (p > 0.05) between both tested groups at all intervals, whereas, color stability had a statistically insignificant difference (p > 0.05) between both tested at T0 and T1, but there was a statistically significant difference (p-value 0.05) between both tested groups at T1 and T2; however, that difference was clinically insignificant. Both groups showed acceptable marginal adaptation, suitable color matching, and color stability with high patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: After 1-year of follow-up, TriLuxe forte and multicolored Vita Enamic laminate veneers showed successful marginal adaptation, shade matching, and patient satisfaction. This indicates that both materials can be recommended to be used as anterior single or multiple veneer restorations in clinical situations for optimum esthetic outcome. How to cite this article: Naji KF, Al Ansary HE, Elnaggar GAE, et al. Marginal Adaptation, Shade Matching, and Patient Satisfaction of Polychromatic Feldspathic Porcelain vs Polychromatic Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(5):433-447.