Abstract
UNLABELLED: The Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index is widely used for detecting carious lesions, primarily focusing on established cavities, while the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDA-S-II) is designed to identify incipient lesions.
AIM: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the DMFT index compared to the ICDA-S-II criteria designed for early-stage carious lesion diagnosis in schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil).
MATERIALS AND METHOD: A cohort of 107 twelve-year-old schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil) underwent dental examinations by three calibrated examiners using the DMFT and ICDA-S-II indices. The ICDA-SII assessment involved prophylaxis, relative isolation, and a standardized drying period. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, chi-squared and G tests.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed among examiners for either the DMFT (p = 0.699) or the ICDA-S-II (p = 1.000) indices. Gender did not influence results (DMFT: p = 0.697; ICDA-S-II: p = 0.310). Caries-free prevalence differed significantly, at 32% according to DMFT and 2.8% according to ICDA-S-II (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The DMFT index consistently underestimated carious lesions, whereas the ICDA-SII index enhanced the identification of incipient potentially reversible lesions. DMFT and ICDAS-II indices have demonstrated their efficacy in cavity detection, with the most significant distinction arising in ICDAS-II in the identification of early-stage carious lesions.