Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) is best achieved by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as it helps differentiate sustained hypertension (SH) from white coat hypertension (WCH).
AIM: To diagnose SH and WCH in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.
MATERIALS: All newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) ≥140/90 mm Hg, attending the medical outpatient department and not on any antihypertensive treatment, were included in the study.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of ABPM in newly diagnosed hypertensive subjects by comparing OBPM with ABPM readings.
METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 196 newly diagnosed HTN patients over a period of 18 months. All hypertensive patients were subjected to ABPM. Patients with persistent HTN on ABPM were labeled as SH, whereas those with normal blood pressure on ABPM were labeled as WCH.
RESULTS: SH was diagnosed in 143 out of 196 (73%) patients. WCH was detected in 53 patients (27%). Patients with SH had a significant family history of HTN compared to patients with WCH (82.5 vs 45.3%, p = 0.00), higher office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to WCH (96.56 ± 4.63 vs 94.13 ± 3.23, p = 0.000), and significant nondipping pattern compared to WCH (37.1 vs 18.9%, p = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: ABPM should be performed in all newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially if they have no family history of HTN and DBP is <95 mm Hg, to rule out WCH.